Review of Agricultural Modernization and Anti-poverty Policies in China(1978-2012)
Research Center for Rural Economy, Ministry of Agriculture, P. R. China International Poverty Reduction Center in China
July, 2012
PART I
Review of Agricultural Modernization in China1
1 Introduction
The Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee of China’s Communist Party marked the beginning of rural reforms in China. From 1978 to 1984, the rural reform started from the fundamental management system in rural areas to abolish the people's communes and institute the responsibility system, the main form of which was the household contract that linked remuneration to output, thereby preliminarily establishing the household contract system. From 1985 to 1991, following the establishment of household contract system, the rural reform witnessed a comprehensive development by focusing on reforming the purchasing and marketing system of agricultural products, developing township and village enterprises (TVEs), and practicing self-governance among villagers. From 1992 to 2001, in line with the requirements of establishing socialist market economic system, the rural reform was deepened by stabilizing and improving the fundamental management system in rural areas, deepening the reform of distribution system for agricultural products, encouraging institutional innovation in TVEs, adjusting the rural industry structure, and speeding up the rural labor migration. Since 2002, the rural reform has entered a new stage of integrated urban-rural development by stabilizing and completing the land tenure system, conducting an all-around rural tax and fee system reform, deepening the reform of grain and cotton distribution systems, establishing the agricultural subsidy policy system, expanding the opening of agriculture, improving the rural labor employment environment, and pushing forward rural constructions.
So far China’s rural reform has made significant achievements. First, the principal position of farmer households in production and management has been set up. Meanwhile, the dual management system that integrates unified with separate management on the basis of household contract management has preliminarily taken shape. Second, state monopoly over purchasing and marketing was abolished and the distribution system for agricultural products and rural marketing system have been cultivated. Third, the highly centralized planned economic system was broken and the marketing mechanism began to play a basic role in resource allocation. Fourth, closeness or semi-closeness of agriculture was terminated and the opening up is increasingly expanded. Fifth, the people's communes were abolished and the democracy at the grass-roots level was gradually promoted. Sixth, integrated rural-urban development was implemented to preliminarily break the urban-rural dual
1 This part is written by the research team of Research Center for Rural Economy, Ministry of Agriculture, P. R. China. The team members are Song Hongyuan, Zhao Changbao, Wu Zhigang, Ma Yongliang, Wang Ou, Chen Yanli, Zhang Hengchun, Su Zhen and Zhang Hongkui.
economic structure.
Policy is one of the core factors to promote the agricultural development. During the last 30 years, following the gradual promotion and continuous deepening of the rural reform, China has continuously adjusted and improved the economic policies on agriculture and rural areas. In particular, the Central Committee of the China’s Communist Party and the State Council have implemented a series of powerful policies and measures to promote the development of agriculture and rural areas since 2004. In this case, the agricultural policy system has basically taken shape in building a well-off society in an all-round way. These policies and measures have greatly promoted the development of agriculture in China, to successfully feed 20% of the world’s population with merely less than 6% of the world’s freshwater and 9% of the world’s arable land.
Poverty alleviation is always an important content of China’s rural reform and is also the major focus of agricultural policies. Although the focus of China’s agricultural policies has been adjusted at different phases, the two core objectives remain unchanged, that is, guaranteeing the effective supply of major agricultural products and improving the income level of rural residents. The agricultural policies which are built up and improved by increasing both production and income have played a critical role in alleviating problems in China’s rural areas. Many scholars suggest that reforming land use right and improving agricultural price have increased the income of farmers and are the major driving force for alleviating poverty in the early days of the opening-up and reform. Policies issued in recent years to support agriculture and to benefit and to rich farmers have also exerted positive influence on poverty reduction in rural areas. In particular, the agricultural subsidies and policies to exempt agricultural taxes have directly alleviated the taxation burden of the poverty-stricken population. In this way it has benefited farmers implementing agricultural management, especially those easy to get into poverty. These policies and development-based poverty alleviation supplement each other, together promoting China’s poverty reduction undertakings and contributing to the poverty alleviation and elimination across the world.
This report will briefly introduce the forming process and basic framework of China’s agricultural policy system and specify some of the policies. Due to the limited number of supported materials, currently we cannot make a comprehensive assessment of the effect of these policies. However, these series of policies and measures have undoubtedly made direct or indirect contributions to China’s poverty reduction.
2 Overview of Agricultural Modernization Process and Agricultural Policy System in China
2.1 Development of Agriculture in China
Through over thirty years’ development, the agriculture in China has achieved a historical progress. The agricultural production has continuously developed. The rural economy has seen an overall prosperity, and the living standards of farmers have been improved significantly. Generally, there are five major aspects of achievements of development of agriculture.
First, the output of agricultural products is growing substantially and major agricultural products have been shifted from chronic shortage to aggregate balance and surplus during good harvest years. From 1978 to 2011, the grain output in China increased from 304.765 million tons to 571.21 million tons in 2011, cotton output from 2.17 million tons to 6.6 million tons, meat output from 10.62 million tons to 79.54 million tons, and aquatic product output from 4.65 million tons to 56.11 million tons. Also in this period, the output of grain, vegetables, fruits, meat, and aquatic products ranked first in the world for years.
Second, the structure of agricultural production is significantly optimized. The internal structure of the agriculture industry has seen marked improvement, with the output value proportion of farming decreasing from 80.0% to 53.3%, output value proportion of forestry increasing from 3.4% to 3.7%, output value proportion of animal husbandry increasing from 15.0% to 30.0%, and output value proportion of fisheries operations increasing from 1.6% to 9.3%.
Third, the intensification level of agriculture is greatly improved. The technology contribution is improved year by year and the contribution of technologies to agriculture had reached 53.5% in 2011, a 26 percentage increase from that in 1978. Agricultural mechanization has been improved rapidly and the mechanization of farming, seeding and harvesting had reached 54.5% in 2001, up 33.7 percentage point compared with that in 1978.
Fourth, the income of farmers sees a continuous growth. From 1978 to 2011, the per capita net income of farmers increased from CNY 152 to CNY 6, 977, with an average annual increase of 7.4%. The Engel’s coefficient of rural residents decreased from 67.7% to 40.4%. Since 2010, the growth of rural residents’ incomes has successively exceeded that of urban residents, narrowing the gap of incomes between rural residents and urban residents.
Fifth, with the rapid development of agriculture, the modernization level of Chinese agriculture keeps on improving. Based on the measurement standards and methods of task groups of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, by using measurement indicators in 2011 like output value proportion of agriculture, proportion of people engaged in agriculture, commodity rate of agricultural products, agricultural labor productivity, agricultural mechanization rate and contribution of science and technology progress on agriculture development, currently, China’s agriculture modernization has entered into the growth phase in an overall manner, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Flag value of main indicators in terms of China’s agricultural modernization in different phases
Traditional |
Implementation Period of |
Agricultural |
|||||
Main Indicators |
Agricultural Modernization |
Post-moder |
Data in |
||||
Agriculture |
|||||||
Starting |
Growth |
Maturity |
nization |
2011 |
|||
Phase |
|||||||
Phase |
Phase |
Phase |
Phase |
||||
Output value |
|||||||
proportion of |
>50% |
20%-50% |
10%-20% |
5%-10% |
<5% |
10.1%* |
|
agriculture |
|||||||
Proportion of |
|||||||
people engaged |
>80% |
50%-80% |
20%-50% |
6%-20% |
<6% |
36.7%* |
|
in agriculture |
|||||||
Commodity rate |
|||||||
of agricultural |
<30% |
30%-60% |
60%-90% |
90%-95% |
>95% |
84.3%** |
|
products |
|||||||
Agricultural labor |
|||||||
productivity (CNY |
<0.54 |
0.54-1.28 |
1.28-2.16 |
2.16-3.60 |
>3.60 |
1.45* |
|
10,000/person) |
|||||||
Agricultural |
|||||||
mechanization |
<5% |
5%-30% |
30%-60% |
60%-80% |
>80% |
54.5% |
|
rate |
|||||||
Contribution of |
|||||||
science and |
|||||||
technology |
<5% |
5%-30% |
30%-60% |
60%-80% |
>80% |
53.5% |
|
progress on |
|||||||
agriculture |
|||||||
development |
Note: The standards for dividing agricultural modernization phases are determined by the research results of the tasks groups of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2010) and Huang Delin (2010). * Data are from 2010.
** Data are from 2009.
Source: The agricultural mechanization rate and contribution of science and technology progress on agriculture development are released by Ministry of Agriculture. The commodity rate of agricultural products is replaced with the commodity rate of farming produce. Other data are sourced from China Statistical Yearbook (2011), National Agricultural Production Cost and Revenue Information Summary, and Statistical Bulletin in 2011.
Although the agriculture in China has made substantial growth, the agricultural modernization process still lags behind compared with the fast industrialization and urbanization,and agricultural development still confronts many contradictions and problems. First, resource restriction on agricultural production is further intensified due to increasingly tense freshwater resources and growing influence of climate changes. Second, the demand for agricultural products continuously increases and the requirement for quality also increases, intensifying the pressure on grain security and supply of major agricultural products. Third, the aging and personal quality structure of people engaged in agriculture is becoming prominent and the problem of insufficient labor capital to develop modern agriculture takes into shape. Fourth, the material equipment level of agriculture is low and the technological innovation and promotion capabilities of agriculture are relatively low. Fifth, many factor resources like capital, technologies, talent and management, flow from agriculture and rural areas to industry and urban areas in an accelerated manner, severely weakening the capability of agriculture and rural areas for sustainable development. Sixth, the small-scale agricultural production in decentralized management mode, and professionalism, standardization, scale, and intensification of production and management are very low.
In addition, the agricultural product market system, socialized service system for agriculture, and agriculture support and protection system have yet to be improved.
2.2 Evolution of Agricultural Policies in China
Since the rural reform is gradually deepened, China’s agricultural policies have been subject to constant adjustment and improvement. The external environment and major problems to be resolved related to agriculture and rural areas vary with historical periods. As a result, the evolution of China’s agricultural policies also embodies prominent phase characteristics. In general, the evolution of agricultural policies can be divided into the following stages.
From 1978 to 1984, the household contract system was implemented and the reform of distribution system for agricultural products was launched. Before the reform, the people’s commune system featuring large in size and collective in nature and integration of government administration with commune management was implemented in rural areas of China. In that case, the enthusiasm of farmers for production was not high and the agricultural productivity was extremely low. In 1978, the reform was first initiated from changing the fundamental management system in rural areas, to promote the household production contract system, separate the land ownership from the land management right, and establish the principal position of farmers in production and management. Meanwhile, the reform of the distribution system for agricultural products was initiated. The procurement price of agricultural products such as grain was raised. In 1979, the average procurement price of 18 major agricultural products such as grain, cotton and oil was raised by 24.8%. The monopolized procurement scope was narrowed and the procurement categories were reduced. In addition, the 25 mandatory production plan targets issued by the country towards major agricultural products were basically abolished. Restrictions on trade markets were released to allow negotiated purchasing and marketing, and released purchasing and marketing of some agricultural products. During the period from 1978 to 1983, the transaction amount of produce fairs increased by about 100%.
From 1985 to 1991, the state monopoly of agricultural products procurement was abolished and the duel system for agricultural product distribution was implemented. A huge increase in the capability to supply agricultural products minimizes the necessity for the long-term unified purchasing grain. In 1985, the Chinese government decided to abolish the unified purchasing of agricultural products by the state according to fixed quotas. Except several categories, no unified purchasing according to fixed quotes would be delivered to farmers. Instead, contract purchase and market purchase. For major agricultural products of vital importance to the nation’s economy and the people’s livelihood, the ‘duel system’ was applied. In addition, the mandatory plan management was performed on grain and cotton. The unified purchasing was abolished in form. Instead, contract purchasing was used. The purchasing base number and price were managed by the state. The agricultural products surplus after the unified purchasing task was finished can be sold on market. The price was subject to market fluctuation. Meanwhile, the operation and distribution of fresh agricultural products such as fruits, vegetables and aquatic products were further opened to cultivate multiple forms of distribution subjects.
The market-oriented reform process of the agricultural product distribution system was greatly accelerated. In 1993, the quantitative rations method that had been implemented for forty years was basically abolished. Since 1994, the ’maintaining ordered quantity of grain and enabling price to vary with market fluctuation’ policy has been implemented on the grain ordered by the state, completely abolishing the unified purchasing of agricultural products by the state according to fixed quotas. In 2001, the market-oriented reform of grain purchasing and marketing was carried out across the whole country. In the same year, the cotton market was fully opened. As a result, the market-oriented distribution system for agricultural products was basically set up. To ensure the stable supply of grain, the grain reserve system and grain risk funds were successively established by the state and the provincial governors assuming responsibility for the ‘rice bag’ (which means grain supply in Chinese) was implemented. In 2001, after China entered into the WTO, the regulation mode of the Chinese government towards agriculture was likely to change and the non-price regulation become the major means supplemented by price regulation. By so doing, the macro-regulation capability of agriculture was continuously strengthened.
From 1992 to 2001, the distribution system of agricultural products was established and the Macro-adjustment system of agriculture was explored. The market-oriented reform process of the agricultural product distribution system was greatly accelerated. In 1993, the quantitative rations method that had been implemented for 40 years was basically abolished. Since 1994, the “maintaining ordered quantity of grain and enabling price to vary with market fluctuation” policy has been implemented on the grain ordered by the state, completely abolishing the unified purchasing of agricultural products by the state according to fixed quotas. In 2001, the market-oriented reform of grain purchasing and marketing was carried out across the nation. In the same year, the cotton market was fully opened. Up to this point, the market-oriented distribution system for agricultural products is basically set up. To ensure the stable supply of grain, the grain reserve system and grain risk funds were successively established by the state and the provincial governors assuming responsibility for the “rice bag” (which means grain supply in Chinese) was implemented. In 2001, after China entered into the WTO, the regulation mode of the Chinese government towards agriculture was likely to change and the non-price regulation become the major means supplemented by price regulation. As a result, the macro-regulation capability of agriculture had been continuously strengthened.
From 2002 till now, the agricultural support and protection system was improved to boost the industry-agriculture and integrated urban-rural development. Since entering the new century, China’s GDP per capita has exceeded 1,000 US dollars in a stable manner. The comprehensive national strength and state financial situation have been significant improved. However, the problem of imbalanced industry-agriculture and urban-rural development was gradually prominent. Against this circumstance, the Chinese government decided to put agriculture and rural area development into a more prominent position. Since 2002, the Chinese government has pushed forward the guiding ideology that “agriculture, rural areas, farmers” are the priority of the all, specified that the coordinated urban-rural development is the fundamental strategy, carried out the basic principle for “agriculture, rural areas, farmers” work (i.e. “giving more to, taking less from and liberalizing the farmers" and “industry nurturing agriculture and cities supporting the rural areas”), and introduced a series of policies to aid agriculture and to benefit and rich farmers. The agricultural taxes were abolished in an all-round manner. In 2006, the three categories and twelve types of taxes and fees originally levied on farmers were completely abolished across the state. The input in agriculture and in rural areas was increased. From 2006 to 2011, the expenditure on “agriculture, rural areas, farmers” arranged by the central budget increased from 339.7 billion Yuan to 1040.8 billion Yuan. The proportion of the expenditure on “agriculture, rural areas, farmers” in the budget spending increased from 14.5% to 18.4%. The subsidies for agricultural production are carried out with five categories of subsidies, respectively direct subsidies for grain farmers, subsidies for high-quality seeds, agricultural machinery subsidy, comprehensive subsidies for agricultural input and subsidies for agricultural insurance. The categories and scopes of subsidies are further expanded. In addition, the government further strengthened the infrastructure construction for agriculture and rural areas. It also tried to accelerate the pace of agricultural technological progress, develop the social undertakings in rural areas and deepen the rural comprehensive reform. In this way, the new rural construction and modern agricultural development has made significant progress.
2.3 Current Agricultural Policy System in China
Through the last 30 years’ development and reform, a comparatively complete framework for China’s agricultural policies has been established. It mainly consists of 16 categories, as shown in the following figure.
Figure 1 Framework of China’s Agricultural Policies
(c) To carry out the bonus policy for core grain producing areas and improve the food security guarantee level for low-income population.
3 Rural Land Tenure System
3.1 Household Contract Management System
In the early days of reform and opening-up, on the basis of exploration of managerial responsibility systems such as ‘fixed output quotas for individual households’ and ‘work contracted to households’, gradually took shape the household contract management system for rural land. It exerted a huge influence on agricultural production development. Currently, the household contract management system has been established and is relatively stable. The basic content can be concluded as ’consolidating the principal position of households in contract management, stabilizing the rural land contract relationship, normalizing the transfer of the contractual right of land, and implementing the most stringent arable land protection system.’
According to provisions of the Constitution, the duel management system that integrates unified with separate management on the basis of household contract management is the fundamental management system in rural areas. In 1982, the Central Committee of the CCP issued the No. 1 Document on the issue of agriculture, rural areas and farmers, making clear that the system of fixed output quotas for individual households and work contracted to households is part of the socialist agricultural economy". In the 21st century, the Central Committee explicitly requires that the land right should be devolved to rural households and protection should be provided for household contractual right. The Central Committee’s Document No. 1 for 2002 definitely pointed out that the area and land block of the contracted land should be fully implemented to each household. The contract management contracts are signed with each household. The land contractual right certificates should be delivered to each household. Forcible withdrawal of the household contracted land for concentration of landholding is prohibited. The Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Contracting of Rural Land that has been implemented since 2003 explicitly stipulates in the form of law “granting to the farmers long-term and guaranteed land-use right”.
4. To strictly control the shift from arable land to non-farming land. The PRC Land Administration Law passed in 1998 aims to formulate the overall planning of land use through regulations on land purposes, take back the arable land approval right and carry out the dynamic total amount balance system for arable land of “occupying one and supplementing one”, thereby implementing the “most stringent arable land protection system”. In 2004, the State Council released the No. 28 Document reaffirmed to strictly carry out the land administration law, review and approve the land strictly according to the power as prescribed by the law, strictly implement the compensation system for arable land occupation, and strengthen the implementation and management of overall planning of land use, city planning, countryside and market town planning. In 2006, the State Council issued the No. 31 Document, further making clear the responsibilities of land management and arable land protection and proposing that major owners of the local people’s governments at various levels should be responsible for the amount of arable land reserved, basic protection areas of arable land, overall planning of the land use, and annual plan implementation within the responsible administrative regions.
3.2 Management System for Rural Collective Construction Land
In 1958, the people’s commune system was established in rural areas and the rural construction land was turned over to the collective. Before 1981, the rural collective construction land had long been used for free. In 1982, the State Council issued the Administrative Regulations on Land Used for Building Houses in Villages and Towns to require each local government to carry out the land use planning for village and town construction, strictly follow the land use approval procedure, and control the area of construction land targeting at problems such as farmers building houses and construction land use of commune- and brigade-run enterprises and public institutions. The PRC Land Administration Law that has been formally implemented since 1987 stipulates that corresponding compensation should be paid when township enterprise construction or non-farming population in cities and towns building houses has occupied the collective land.
Since 1999, important adjustment has been made to the rural collective construction land system. First, the rural collective construction land was included into the annual plan management of land use. Second, except the land use by establishing township enterprises, building houses by farmers, and carrying out public welfare undertakings, any other institution or individual must use only the state-owned construction land. The collective land-use right cannot be sold, transferred or rented out for non-farming construction purposes. Third, the rural collective economic organizations are endowed with the right to take back the right to use the original land.
3.3 Rural Land Expropriation System
The Regulations Concerning Land Expropriation for State Construction issued in 1982 stipulated that the ownership of the land expropriated by the state belongs to the state and the land-use institutions have only the land-use right; for the leased and borrowed temporary land, after the period of use expires, the farming conditions should be restored and the land should be returned back to the original production team (i.e. land owners). These provisions were subsequently adopted by the PRC Land Administration Law and continued to be used till 2004. In 2004, the State Council released the Decision of the State Council on Furthering the Reform and Intensifying the Land Administration. It requires further enhancing the most stringent land administration system in keeping with China's national conditions.
According to China’s Land Administration Law and relevant provisions issued by the State Council, the main content of the existing rural land expropriation system includes the following aspects. First, before the agricultural land is shifted to the construction land, the ownership of the land should be first taken over by the state. Second, compensation should be made according to the original purposes of the appropriated land in case of appropriating the rural collective land. Third, for projects with stable revenues, farmers can price and convert the land-use right that is approved as prescribed by law into the share to participate in such projects. Fourth, the right to know and the right to be heard of farmers need to be guaranteed. Fifth, the land compensation fees are mainly used for the farmers whose land is appropriated.
4 Policies for Agricultural Research and Education
The Chinese government, relying on the advance of science and technology as a major strategic measure to vitalize agriculture, has issued a series of policies to deepen the reform in agricultural science and technology and promote the development of agricultural science and technology.
4.1 Policies for Agricultural Science and Technology
1. In 1978-1984, the Chinese government reconstructed agricultural research institutions and completed the scientific research system. In order to reconstruct the agricultural scientific research system seriously damaged during the Cultural Revolution. In 1978, the State Council approved the reconstruction of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Forestry Sciences, and the establishment of the Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences by the State Aquatic
Product Bureau. In order to guide agricultural science and technology in China, the National Science and Technology Conference held in the same year passed the Outline of 1978-1985 National Science and Technology Development Planning, in which agriculture as an integrated discipline of overall significance was listed in the 17 key projects. In June 1979, the Ministry of Agriculture released the 1978-1985 National Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Science and Technology Development Planning, forming a more detailed plan for the development of agricultural science and technology. China initially formed the agricultural scientific research system set in the light of natural divisions and economic characteristics and managed at central and local levels.
4. The Chinese government constructed modern agriculture technology system, and strived to realize the breakthrough of agricultural science and technology innovation abilities from 2000. In April of 2001, the State Council printed and distributed the “Program for Development of Agricultural Science and Technology (2001-2010)”, putting forward policies, principles, target tasks, and key emphases in work in the future ten years of the development of agricultural science and technology. In July 2001, the Ministry of Science and Technology released “Guide to Agricultural Science and Technology Parks” and “Administrative Measures for Agricultural Science and Technology Parks (for trial implementation)”, requiring to adopt the modes of operation such as making experiments first, summarizing experience and steadily pushing forward the construction of China’s agricultural science and technology parks. In October 2006, the Ministry of Science and Technology issued “Eleventh National Five-Year Science and Technology Development Planning”, putting forward concrete requirements for agricultural science and technology innovation. In order to meet the needs of the construction of modern agriculture, since 2007, the central government has repeatedly emphasized speeding up the agriculture science and technology research and application, and enhancing the construction of service system of agriculture science and technology. In 2012, the No. 1 Central Document put it focus on speeding up the agricultural science and technology innovation, defined explicitly the agriculture science and technology innovation as the key work of “countryside, agriculture and farmers”, and made overall arrangements for mechanism innovation of agricultural science and technology system, increasing investment in agricultural science and technology, and promoting leaping development of agricultural science and technology in a certain future period.
4.2 Farmers’ Education and Training Policies
Agricultural education is the foundation of the development of agricultural science and technology. As a result of 30 years’ reform and opening up, China has basically formed an agricultural education and training system with tertiary agricultural education as leading, secondary specialized education, farmers’ vocational education and farmer training in an all-round way.
Over the past more than three decades of reform and opening up, China’s agricultural science and technology has developed in an all-round way, and the contribution rate of science and technology to agricultural growth has been going up rapidly. More than 1500 new species and new combinations of major crops have been produced. The year 2011 witnessed 85.8% contribution rate of per unit growth yield to the total yield of grain growth, 53.5% of science and technology to agriculture growth, and 54.5% of comprehensive mechanized farming level. Agricultural science and technology progress has contributed much to guarantee of national grain safety, promotion of agricultural structure adjustment and realization of faster and better development of agricultural and rural economy.
5 The Agricultural Socialization Service System
The establishment of agricultural socialization service system to provide farmers with comprehensive production and operation services is a valuable means to improve the degree of agricultural systematization, and clear up the contradiction between agricultural small production and large markets, a substantial guarantee to stabilize and improve the rural basic management system and safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, and an inevitable requirement to ensure national food safety and realize agricultural modernization. Since the reform, policies for agricultural socialization service system construction in China have roughly passed through three stages:
Initial stage (1980s). In 1980s, with the establishment of household contract management system and the fall of the people’s commune system, issues concerning agricultural production services presented themselves. In this context, the central government put forth to develop agricultural socialization service, and begin to explore its content and constructing approaches. During this period, agricultural socialization service system construction is focused on transformation of functions of original agricultural service organizations. In 1983, it extended to the scope of services that agricultural producers are in urgent need of. In 1986, the No. 1 central file further explicitly pointed out that “to develop rural commodity production requires production service socialization”, and put forward that it was essential to transform the existing cooperation economic organizations, set up new service organizations, and gradually develop professional cooperation organizations. Meanwhile, relevant departments in governments at all levels adopted a series of measures, mainly including: township and village collective economic organizations carried out united seed supply, unified drainage and irrigation, unified plant protection, unified harvest and other services; perfect grass-root agro-technical stations, agricultural machinery station, water carrier station, forest station, animal husbandry and veterinary station, management station and other functions to provide various kinds of services for agriculture; mobilize agricultural scientific research institutions to conduct technical consultation, group contracts, talent training and other services; and develop professional technical associations to provide special services for agriculture.
Great development stage (1990s). In the 1990s, the central first put the agricultural socialization service system on the same height of stable household contract management, further defining clearly contents, forms and specific policies of agricultural socialization service system construction, and stressing the focus of agricultural socialization service system construction was to develop professional economic technical department. In 1991, the State Council issued “Circular about Strengthening Agricultural Socialization Service System Construction”, pointing out, “Agricultural socialization services are services that professional economic technical departments, rural cooperation economic organizations and other social aspects provide for the development of farming, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery industries”. “Agricultural socialization services take rural collective or cooperative economic organizations as foundation, professional economic technology departments as support, farmers’ self-run services as supplement, and thus formed a multi-sector, multi-channel, multi-form and multi-level service system”. By the end of the 1990s, there were only 150 000 farmers’ professional technology associations in rural areas in China, more than 5 million farmers, merely accounting for about 2% of the total number of households across the country.
Improving stage (from the 21st century). In 1998, the 3rd Plenary Session of the 15th
Communist Party of China put forward that by 2010 the rural economic system would have been established to meet the requirements of the socialist market economy, with household contract management as its foundation, and agricultural socialization service system, agricultural product market system and national support protection system as props for agriculture. Starting from 2004, the central has made repeated requests to “perfect agricultural socialization service system”. In 2008, the 3rd Plenary Session of the 17th Communist Party of China passed the Decision on Major Issues of Promoting Rural Reform Development, which explicitly pointed out to accelerate the establishment of new agricultural socialization service system, with public service organizations as backing, cooperation economic organization as foundation, leading enterprises as backbone, other social forces as supplement, the combination of public benefit services and operating services and the coordination of special services and comprehensive services. The so-called new agricultural socialization service system mainly includes agricultural technology extension system, animal and plant disease prevention and control system, agricultural product quality supervision system, agricultural product market system, agricultural information collection and release system, agricultural financial and insurance service body, etc.
The important content of agricultural socialization service system construction was to reform professional economic technical departments in this period. In April 2001, the Outline of Agricultural Science and Technology (2001-2010) issued by the State Council, proposed actively promoting the agricultural extension system reform on the safe side, mobilizing farmers, enterprises and other social forces to participate in agricultural technology extension work, and gradually form the new agricultural technology extension system by combining national support with market guidance, and combining paid service with free service. In 2003, related ministries and commissions organized and conducted agricultural technology extension system reform pilots, with “public security mode”, “Jiangyan mode” and “Xinchang mode”, etc. cropping up.
Supporting the development of farmers’ specialized cooperative economic organization is a new thinking of this period. In 2001, in “Opinions on Doing Well Agricultural and Rural Work in 2001”, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council put forth that for any cooperation organization “as long as there is market and benefits, and as long as farmers’ income goes up, it should be equally treated without discrimination and be given support”. In 2004, the central and local governments mapped out special funds, and supported farmers’ specialized cooperative organizations to conduct services such as information, technology, training, quality standards and certification, marketing to properly reduce related taxes. In October 2006, the promulgation of the Farmers’ Professional Co-operative Law of the People’s Republic of China propelled farmers’ professional cooperative organizations into the rapid developmental stage. The central and local has promulgated a series of involving the fiscal, taxation, market and talent to support policies.
The agricultural socialization service system in China has gradually formulated. It keeps improving as it takes public service as main body, business service as supplement, puts priority on agricultural technology extension, agricultural economy management, agricultural machinery services, agricultural materials supply, agricultural products circulation. Thus, it basically formed a multi-agricultural technology extension service system constituted by the state public welfare agricultural technology extension, enterprise profit-making agricultural technology extension and nonprofit agricultural technology extension for professional cooperation organizations; preliminarily established central-provincial-county-township animal epidemic disease prevention and control system; by and large formed an agricultural product quality certification system with product certification as the focus, system authentication as supplement, etc., and played an important role in the process of promoting the transformation from traditional agriculture to modem agriculture.
6 Policies for Agricultural Product Processing, Marketing and Trade
6.1 Agricultural Product Processing
Since the late 1990s, the supply of major agricultural products in China has significantly improved. To increase added value of agricultural products and farmers’ income, and to transfer rural surplus labor force, China has attached more and more importance to the development of agricultural product processing industry and formulated a series of supportive policies.
In 2004, the No. 1 Central Document suggested, according to the state industrial policy requirements, the government guided a reasonable layout of agricultural product processing industry, and helped main producing areas develop agricultural product processing industry with grain as main raw materials, especially deep processing. Through the technical improvement loan discount, investment and purchasing shares, tax policies and other measures, support main producing areas to establish and transform a number of major agricultural product processing, seed marketing and agricultural science and technology enterprises. The newly established small and medium-sized agricultural and sideline products processing enterprises strengthened their business support and services. No matter what kind of ownership and management form it is, any leading enterprise that set up reasonable benefit coupling mechanism with farmers and bring benefits to the farmers, should be supported without discrimination in terms of finance, taxation and banking, etc.
In 2007, in accordance with the No. 1 Central Document, through interest subsidy, investment and purchasing shares, tax incentives and other policies, support the development of agricultural products processing industry. The central and provincial finance should map out subsidy funds to support agricultural product processing, and support leading enterprises to be engaged in technological introduction and technical transformation. Improve policies for agricultural product processing industry value-added taxes, and reduce agricultural product processing enterprise tax bearing. Financial institutions should intensify leading enterprises’ credit aid, and focus on the solution of money problems in agricultural products acquisition. In 2012, the No. 1 central file proposed an aid to the construction of producing area agricultural products collection, processing, packaging, storage and other supporting facilities, putting priority on subsidies to preliminary working and storage facilities in farmers’ professional cooperative construction.
In 2012, “Opinions on Supporting the Development of Agricultural Industrialization Leading Enterprises” issued by the State Council put forward clearly to strive to develop agricultural products processing to promote industrial optimization; improve conditions of processing facilities and equipment, plan as a whole and coordinate agricultural product processing, encourage leading enterprises reasonable development of agricultural product deep processing, extend industry chains, and increase added value of products. These policies marked a significant milestone for promoting the development of agricultural product processing industry, and laid a solid foundation for further improving the supportive system of agricultural product processing industry policies.
Over the past decade, China’s agricultural product processing industry has developed so rapidly that it has become one of the most energetic industries in national economy. In 2003-2010, the total value of the processing industry of agricultural products increased from 2.75 trillion Yuan to 12.27 trillion Yuan, annually up 23.8% on average. The ratio between the agricultural product processing industry output value and the agricultural output value rose from 0.6:1 to 1.7:1.
6.2 Agricultural Product Marketing
Since reform and opening up, China’s agricultural product circulation system reform has experienced four stages.
From 1985, except some individual varieties, China’s government changed its monopolized procurement of agricultural products to carry out contract and market order instead. Except that the government made the purchase price of grain, cotton, etc., other fresh agricultural product prices are determined by the market. The country completely lift the control over the primary agricultural products market, allowing vegetable growers and vendors to sell vegetables in the city, and the country build non-staple food wholesale markets in large and medium-sized cities. Wholesale markets become the main channels of the circulation of agricultural products except only a few other varieties like cotton.
The gradual improvement of agricultural product circulation policy system promotes the more rapid development of China’s agricultural product markets. Agricultural wholesale market construction gets further strengthened, monomer market transaction size gets significantly increased, and market radiation driving force is obviously increased. Agricultural product futures market scale is being unceasingly expanded, and price discovery and hedging function began to bring into play. Agricultural product electronic commerce gradually rises, and informatization level of agricultural production and operation continuously improves. Obvious diversification trend of circulation main body, farmer agents, transportation, marketing major clients, cooperation organizations and new large market main body grow stronger and stronger. Modern modes of circulation such as “farmer-supermarket partnership” and “farmer-community partnership” are developing rapidly. The pattern that multiple modes of circulation are adopted side by side has to certain extend formulated.
6.3 Agricultural Trade
Since the reform and opening up, reforms in agricultural product trade system and policies in China have experienced three stages as follows.
Currently, China’s agricultural product trade policies mainly include import policy, export policy and regional free trade arrangement. In terms of China’s import policy, China introduced tariff quota management of some important agricultural products, and made respective commitment to each tariff quota product’s state-run trade proportion and specific trade enterprise. In terms of export policy, China abolished agricultural products’ import and export subsidies, and at the same time, abolished railway construction funds of rice, wheat and other major agricultural products so as to keep fair to both domestic products and international products in transportation costs and tax bearing. In terms of free trade arrangement, China added the “Asia-Pacific Trade Agreement”, and actively conducted free trade area negotiations with countries all over the world. So far, China has set up 15 free trade areas with 28 countries and regions in five continents. Meanwhile, China has completed regional trade arrangement joint research with India, and free trade area joint research with South Korea, and is conducting government-business-academia joint research in China-Japan-South Korea free trade area.
7 The Agricultural Investment and Rural Infrastructure
Construction in China
Agriculture Input Policies
The implementation of household contract management system has changed the form of agricultural micro economy organization. In response, diversity of investment structures has gradually come into being, mainly involving farmers, communities and the country. Since the reform and opening up, policies for financial input in agriculture evolve through the following process:
4. Since 2004, in accordance with the requirements of integrated urban and rural development, the financial and credit investment has been strengthened to gradually establish stable growth mechanism for agricultural-support input. The Chinese government invested from the aspect of finance, adhering to the guideline of "give more, take less, and made it flexible", and increased the national financial investment to agriculture and rural area. Agricultural tax was fully abolished in 2006 and the agricultural subsidy policy which takes "four subsidies" as representative method was issued. All these show that the direct subsidy provided to the farmers directly is enlarged year by year. In the aspect of credit investment, the rural financial system is reformed and innovated, the reform strength of rural credit cooperatives is enlarged, thus to ease the rural capital flowing-out situation. For the aspect of social capital investment, agricultural and rural area infrastructural facility investment fields are further widened. Measures like interest so deducted, subsidy, and taxes are adopted to encourage social capital to be positively invested in agriculture and rural area infrastructural facility construction.
Based on the continuous carrying-on of the existing policies and measures, in 2012, the central government proposes the requirements of "three keeps", namely "keep enlarging the financial expense on "farmer, rural area, and agriculture", keep enlarging the national fixed assets investment to agriculture and rural area, and keep enlarging the investment on agricultural technology, to guarantee that both the increment and proportion can be raised." In the aspect of credit, it is required to "strength the financial support for rural area, keep increasing the investment for rural area credit, and guarantee that the increase speed of banking industry's loan concerning agricultural aspect be higher than the average increase speed of all loans. Keep develop the small amount credit business for farmers and strengthen the credit to large family of planting, professional farmer cooperatives, and township small scale enterprises. Meanwhile, it is required to "positively guide the farmers and social capital to invest in aspects of agriculture, rural area, and farmer, effectively integrate the national resources, raise the utilization rate of the capitals, and practically supervise the utilization of national investment and subsidies to the aspects of agriculture, rural area, and farmer.
Since the start of reform and opening-up to the outside world policy, China's total investment on agriculture keeps increasing, investment channels keep being widened, and the sources of capital keep spread. Up to now, the new format of diversified agricultural investment which takes the state, collectivity, farmer, and enterprise as the main bodies has been gradually formed. The central government's financial investment in agriculture reaches 1040.86 billion Yuan in 2011 from the original 15.07 billion Yuan in 1978, which shows an annual increase rate of 13.7%. For the agricultural credit investment, though it fluctuates a lot, in general, it keeps rapid increasing trend since 2001, reaching 399.4 billion Yuan in 2009 from the original 82.3 billion Yuan (see Figure 2). The investments for farmers and agriculture kept increasing, especially during the period from 2004. The increasing speed was accelerated obviously. Per capita family operating expense and expense for purchasing production fixed assets of farmers reached 1901 Yuan from the original 1032 Yuan, showing an annual increase of about 13% (see Figure 3).
Figure 2 Agricultural Credit Investment Changes from 1980 to 2008
Source: Almanac for Investigation of Chinese Rural Resident
Figure 3 Farmers’ Agricultural Investment from 1981 to 2008
Source: Almanac of Chinese Statistics
7.2 Construction of Agricultural Infrastructural Facility
Since the start of reform and opening-up to the outside world, the state has implemented a series of major projects concerning agricultural infrastructural facility construction, mainly including:
1. Launch the commodity grain base construction in mid-1980s. From 1984, the state started the construction project of commodity grain base. In 1986, the cotton base county construction project was started. Meanwhile, constructions of 5 million tons commodity grain base land reclamation, caoutchouc base, "vegetable basket" project, muscle type commodity pig base, and ocean fleet were implemented.
Since the start of the reform and opening-up, the farmland irrigation works has always been the key point of agricultural infrastructural facility construction. In 1980s, the key point of farmland irrigation works referred to the repair, resuming, auxiliary construction, reconstruction, and improvement to the existing facilities. In 1990s, in order to settle the situation of natural disasters which was getting worse and worse, it included a serious shortage of water resource and flood disasters, the national transferred the key point of farmland irrigation works to the treatment of major rivers and construction of key irrigation works. After 1999, under the background of frequent happening of natural disaster and continuous reduction of grain output, middle and small scale of farmland irrigation works were developed at the time of keeping maintaining, updating, and construction auxiliary works for the original farmland irrigation works. After over 30 years of large scale farmland irrigation works construction, China has initially established the mechanism of using irrigation works to reduce disaster loss and promote agriculture development.
Currently, the main policies concerning the agricultural infrastructural facility construction include four aspects. (1) Enlarging the financial investment on the agriculture infrastructural facility construction. (2) Guiding the social capital investment on agricultural infrastructural facility construction. (3) Promoting the balance regional development. (4) Reforming the rural area small scale infrastructural facility property right system. With the continuous increase of agricultural investment, the agricultural infrastructural facility construction will be strengthened. In addition, the Chinese comprehensive agricultural production capacity will be raised obviously.
8 Agricultural Environment Protection and Ecological
Construction
For a long time, due to the continuous population increase and human factors such as deforestation and wasteland reclaiming, and unreasonable utilization of land resource, agricultural and ecological unbalance, blown sand hazard, and serious water loss and soil erosion have occurred in a lot of areas of China. It severely affects the agricultural and animal husbandry production. In order to change such a situation, the Chinese government has been strengthening ecological environmental protection since the reform and opening-up. From the large-scale shelter forest construction started from 1970s, voluntary tree planting movement participated by the whole people and main ecological engineering construction on forestry, to the ecological agriculture construction, biodiversity protection, natural forest protection and conversion of farmland to forest (grassland) in 1990s, the agricultural ecological construction of China has experienced a continually developed and improved process.
1. “Three-North” shelter forest project launched at the end of 1970s. Forestry plays a decisive role in keeping ecological balance and protecting natural environment. In 1979, the Central government determined to construct large-scale shelter forest engineering in regions with serious blown sand hazard and water loss and soil erosion in West China, the north of North China and the west of Northeast China in order to improve ecological environment and promote local economic and social sustainable development. In May 1980, the State Council approved Three-North Shelter Forest Construction Leading Group Meeting Minutes. It pointed out that the shelter forest system in West China, the north of North China and the west of Northeast China was a key engineering of China with strategic meaning. The 1982 Government Work Report and the Sixth “Five-Year” Plan for National Economy and Social Development specifically proposed that:
“We shall continue to construct the shelter forest system in West China, North China, and Northeast China to manage the water loss in the midstream of the Yellow River and the sand-blown-by-wind land in West China.”
In addition, local governments of 11 provinces (regions) in the “Three-North” area attached great importance to the engineering construction. They held meetings, introduced policies, and take measures to actively carry forward the engineering construction. The “Three-north” shelter forest system construction first promoted ecological improvement and environmental protection to a state will, leading the ecological construction of China.
4. “One Return for Three” policy at the end of 1990s. After 1990s, owning to ecological environmental destruction and other reasons, natural disasters has frequently occurred in China, giving rise to huge loss. For this reason, the Central government determined to gradually convert farmland to forest, grassland, and lake on lands which are excessively reclaimed and enclosed for cultivation in a planned way. It also wrote related policies into National Ecological Environmental Construction Plan, and Regulation on Conversion of Farmland to Forest, and China's National Climate Change Program introduced by the Central government.
In order to improve the ecological environment of grassland, China has launched a series of engineering projects since 2000. These projects include natural grassland vegetation restoration, grassland fence, and grass seed base, carried out manual grass planting, aerial seeding of forage grass, and fence exclusion, constructed and protected the grassland, pushed forward grassland contract responsibility system, implemented paid use system, and improved the enthusiasm of herdsmen to protect and construct the grassland. From 2003, the Central government revised Grassland Law of the People’s Republic of China and provinces (autonomous regions) of animal husbandry also successively promulgated Regulations on Management of Grassland and Rules for the Implementation of Grassland Law, thus the ecological construction and management of grassland were legalized. In 2010, the State Council determined to comprehensively establish the grassland ecological protection subsidy and award mechanism in eight main provinces (regions) with grassland pasturing areas including Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, Tibetan, Qinghai, Sichuan, Gansu, Ningxia, and Yunnan, marking that work on the pasturing areas of grassland entered a new stage.
5. Agricultural Non-point source pollution prevention policies since the beginning of 21st Century. As the large-scale livestock and poultry industry develops rapidly in China, the agricultural non-point source pollution is increasingly serious. In order to effectively reduce the pollution of waste and sewage on surrounding environment at the livestock and poultry farm, in March 2001, State Environmental Protection Administration promulgated Measures for the Administration of Livestock and Poultry Pollution Prevention and issued matched Livestock and Poultry Pollutant. Discharge Standard and Technical Specification of Livestock and Poultry Pollution. Besides, Ministry of Agriculture also organized to formulate Large-scale and Medium Livestock and Poultry Farm Energy and Environment Demonstration Engineering Construction plan (2001-2005). On the farmland environmental evaluation of agricultural products, State Environmental Protection Administration formulated Farmland Environmental Quality Evaluation Standards for Edible Agricultural Products and Farmland Environmental Quality Evaluation Standards for Livestock and Poultry Production. Law of the People's Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Water Pollution revised in February 2008 regulated the prevention and control of agricultural and rural water pollution.
6. Rural renewable energy policy. China has rich waste resources with great development and utilization potential. However, these resources have not been effectively developed and utilized for a long term. It is partly due to the lack of investment and backward technologies, which seriously polluted the environment. Therefore, since the beginning of 21st century, the Central government has determined to vigorously carry forward the utilization of rural renewable energy. The Fifth Plenum of the sixteenth Central Committee of the Communist Party of China specified that “we shall strengthen the popularization on rural methane and develop clean energy which is suitable for rural characteristics”. In 2006, the Ministry of Agriculture launched an ecological home and people enriched action, which proposed we should vigorously popularize rural methane.
In March 2007, the Ministry of Agriculture promulgated National Rural Methane Engineering Construction Plan (2006-2010). It proposed, during “11th Five-Year plan”, the newly built rural methane users would come at about 23 million households. By the end of 2010, it would reach about 40 million households, about 30% against suitable peasant households. In April 2007, the Ministry of Agriculture and National Development and Reform Commission formulated National Rural Methane Service System Construction Scheme (for trial implementation). As China gradually strengthens the construction on rural methane, rural methane users are growing steadily with the speed of average annual five million households and large-scale methane engineering such as livestock and poultry farm also increases sharply. The rapid development of rural methane construction effectively improves rural living environment, saves large amount of traditional energy. More importantly, it plays an important role in relieving rural energy shortage, protecting ecological environment, developing rural economy, and improving farmers’ livelihood.
PART II
China's Rural Poverty Alleviation and Development2
9 History of China's Rural Poverty Alleviation, Development and Policy Changes
Along with China's reform and opening up, various macroeconomic reforms and development strategy changes have led to the poverty alleviation and development efforts in rural China to embark on a path with Chinese characteristics. China's rural poverty alleviation and development, especially poverty relief activities supported by pro-poor policies that target the really poor, began with the agricultural construction in the Three West regions in the early 1980s. After that, China has gradually clarified its direction of poverty alleviation and development policies in rural areas. In accordance with poverty alleviation and development policy and planning, China's rural poverty alleviation and development strategy can be divided into four stages: the start-up and regularization stage of poverty alleviation and development (1983-1993), the stage of the "Seven-Year Program to Help 80 Million People Out of Poverty", the stage of the "Outline for Poverty Alleviation and Development of China's Rural Areas (2001-2010)" and the stage of "Outline for Poverty Alleviation and Development of China's Rural Areas (2011-2020)".
9.1 Start-up and regularization stage of poverty alleviation and development (1983-1993)
2 This part is written by Dr. Zhang Deliangand Dr. Xu Liping, research fellows from International Poverty Reduction Center in China.
(1) Organized the implementation of regional poverty alleviation and development programs focusing on agricultural construction in the Three West regions. To address problems of serious damage to vegetation, deterioration of the ecological environment and difficult living situations of the people in some areas of Gansu and Ningxia, the central government launched the agricultural construction program for Three West regions in 1983. It also began a comprehensive regional poverty alleviation and development program in 47 counties in the two west regions of Gansu (central arid regions represented by Dingxi and Hexi Corridor area) and Xihaigu Region of Ningxia. This program prioritized the objectives of "stopping destruction in three years, solving the problem of food and clothing in five years and consolidating the results and improving people’s living standards in two years". In order to ensure the implementation of this plan, the State Council set up the leading group for the "Three West" agricultural construction plan and established special funds for the program. 200 million Yuan was issued per year as subsidies for infrastructure construction, development of farming, aquaculture and a variety of businesses, technology promotion, training, as well as resettlement. The "Three West" poverty alleviation and development program was a prelude to regional poverty alleviation and development in China.
(2) Established poverty alleviation agencies, arranged special poverty-relief funds and started organized, large-scale poverty alleviation and development. In 1986, the state established a specialized poverty alleviation institution – the State Council Leading Group for Economic Development in Poverty-stricken Areas (renamed as the State Council Leading Group on Poverty Alleviation and Development in 1993) and the Leading Group Office. The vast majority of provinces, municipalities and counties also established poverty alleviation and development institutions, allocated special anti-poverty funds, developed special preferential policies, conducted a thorough reform of the traditional relief-type poverty alleviation approach and determined development-oriented pro-poor policies.
(3) Made a series of adjustments and reforms of development policies in relevant poverty-stricken areas. In 1984, the central government issued the "Notice on Helping Poverty-stricken Areas Change Poverty Situation As Soon As Possible" and called on party committees and governments at all levels to attach great importance to helping the people in these regions shake off poverty, improve production conditions and production capacities, develop production of commodities and thereby catch up with the pace of national economic development with a positive attitude through practical measures. Other development policies and measures are as follows.
(7) Started to carry out large-scale training of cadres. In February of 1990, the State Council Leading Group Office of Poverty Alleviation and Development set up the National Training Center for Cadres of Poor Areas and began to organize the training of poverty alleviation and development for party and government leaders of poor areas across the country, as well as provide guidance on rural cadre training and practical technical training for farmers in poverty-stricken areas.
(1) Poverty-stricken population size and poverty rate. In the backdrop of the country's economic reform and opening up, through one decade of poverty alleviation and development efforts, by 1993 great changes had taken place in the poverty situation of rural China. Based on the poverty line set by the Chinese government, the number of poverty-stricken people dropped from 131 million in 1983 to 80.66 million in 1993, with a decrease of 50.34 million and an average annual rate of decline of 6.69%.
Table 2 Incidence of Poverty in Rural China (1984-1993) (%)
Year |
National Bureau of |
World Bank |
||
Statistics |
||||
Incidence of |
Poor |
Incidence of |
Poor |
|
poverty (%) |
population |
poverty (%) |
population |
|
(million) |
(million) |
|||
1984 |
15.1 |
128 |
- |
- |
1985 |
14.8 |
125 |
- |
- |
1986 |
15.5 |
131 |
- |
- |
1987 |
14.3 |
122 |
- |
- |
1988 |
11.1 |
96 |
- |
- |
1989 |
11.6 |
106 |
- |
- |
1990 |
9.5 |
85 |
31.3 |
280 |
1991 |
10.4 |
94 |
31.7 |
287 |
1992 |
8.8 |
80 |
30.1 |
274 |
1993 |
8.8 |
80.66 |
29.1 |
266 |
Source: Data of the National Bureau of Statistics are from the National Bureau of Statistics, data of rural population is from the China Rural Statistical Yearbooks.
(2) The regional distribution of the poor population changed. Despite a lot of efforts to alleviate poverty, due to the imbalance of economic development great changes took place in the distribution of poor people in the eastern, central and western areas. According to available data, the proportion of poverty-stricken people in the three major economic regions in 1988 was: 25% in the east, 37% in the central areas and 38% in the west. In 1993, however, the proportion of poor people in the east dropped to 20% and in the central areas decreased to 29%, while rising in the west to
51%. This indicates that during this period, the number of poor people decreased significantly in the east and central areas and slowly in the west, and the poor were gradually concentrated to the west (NBS).
9.2 Stage of "Seven-Year Program to Help 80 Million People Out of Poverty" (1994-2000)
their resources to support the development of some national poverty-stricken counties. As of 2000, a total of 138 central party and government organs, enterprises, institutions, democratic parties and social organizations had participated in fixed-point poverty alleviation, more than 3000 cadres had been sent to poor counties for poverty reduction, 4.4 billion Yuan of anti-poverty funds had been directly invested and 10.5 billion Yuan of funds had been raised for impoverished regions, which supported a total of 350 poverty-stricken counties.
The State Council made special deployments and specific arrangements on East-West cooperation in poverty alleviation in 1996. Under the principle of "advantage complementation, mutual benefits, long-term cooperation and common development", the collaborators carried out a full range of multilevel cooperation programs in poverty reduction, mainly in the following four ways:
From 1996 to 1999, according to incomplete statistics, the government and all circles of society in the 13 eastern provinces and municipalities donated a total of more than 1 billion Yuan in kind or cash, signed more than 2600 project agreements and actually invested nearly 4 billion Yuan. Meanwhile, 250,000 laborers were transferred from impoverished regions and labor incomes totaled more than 800 million Yuan.
(4) Various sectors actively participated in poverty alleviation. The competent industrial departments carried out fixed-point poverty alleviation and conducted industrial poverty alleviation. The Ministry of Agriculture for example, focused on agricultural development in poverty reduction and the Ministry of Health focused on endemic disease control and the construction of grass-roots medical institutions. Water conservancy departments, gave priority to securing safe drinking water supply for humans and livestock, soil and water conservation, construction of small irrigation and water conservancy projects, rural water conservancy and hydropower development and construction. In order to change the backward educational situation in impoverished regions and speed up the pace of universalizing nine-year compulsory education in poverty-stricken areas, the Ministry of Education has been responsible for the implementation of the "Compulsory Education Project in National Poverty-stricken Areas" in 1995. From 1995 to 2000, the state invested a total of 12.462 billion Yuan of Central special funds and the projects were launched in 852 poor counties, of which 568 were national poor counties and 284 were provincial poor counties. The "Compulsory Education Project in National Poverty-stricken Areas" mainly undertook the task of building and rebuilding primary schools and junior middle schools; purchasing desks, chairs and books; purchasing teaching instruments and equipment; training teachers and headmasters, etc.
(LGOP) and strengthened cooperation with international organizations in the field of poverty reduction by expanding the scale, field and coverage of international cooperation in poverty alleviation. International institutions adopted different approaches to poverty reduction in China and their activities covered a variety of projects in most sectors, including microfinance, small-scale infrastructure construction, community development, environmental protection, technical assistance, capacity building and integrated rural development. Among them, the World Bank invested most and successively provided three loan projects for poverty reduction in the Southwest, Qinba and western regions.
(1) Made progress in reducing the size of poverty-stricken population and the incidence of poverty. At this stage, the number of poverty-stricken people in rural China continued to decline (see Table 2). Based on the national poverty line, in this period, the number of rural poor in China was reduced from 80 million in 1993 to 32.09 million in 2000, with a decrease of 47.91 million within 7 years, or in other words a decrease by 59.89%. The poverty rate also dropped from 8.8% in 1993 to 3.4% in 2000. According to the World Bank standard of one dollar a day, the number of rural poor residents declined from 237 million in 1994 to 111 million in 2000, which constituted a 53.3% decrease within 7 years, with an average annual decrease of 11.9%. The poverty rate also dropped from 25.9% in 1994 to 11.9% in 2000.
Table 3 Rural Poor Population and Incidence of Poverty in China (1994-2000) (%)
Year |
National Bureau of |
World Bank |
||
Statistics |
||||
Incidence of |
Poor |
Incidence of |
Poor |
|
poverty (%) |
population |
poverty (%) |
population |
|
(million) |
(million) |
|||
1994 |
7.6 |
70 |
25.9 |
237 |
1995 |
7.1 |
65 |
21.8 |
200 |
1996 |
6.3 |
58 |
15 |
138 |
1997 |
5.4 |
50 |
13.5 |
124 |
1998 |
4.6 |
42 |
11.7 |
108 |
1999 |
3.7 |
34 |
11.2 |
103 |
2000 |
3.4 |
32 |
11.9 |
110.7 |
Source: Based on the "Preliminary Study on the Poverty Standards and Poverty Situation in Rural China" by Tang Ping ("China's Rural Economy, 1994, 8), "China's Rural Poverty Monitoring Report 2002" of Rural Socioeconomic Survey Corps of National Bureau of Statistics, and data provided by the National Bureau of Statistics and the LGOP. The rural population data is from the "China Rural Statistical Yearbooks".
9.3 Stage of the "Outline for Poverty Alleviation and Development of China's Rural Areas (2001-2010)"
(4) Conducted new rural construction. The objective of the new socialist countryside construction program was to make rural areas grow into the new socialist countryside characterized by "developed production, affluent life, civilized customs, clean and tidy villages, and democratic management". Under this objective the framework of new rural construction was set up, with the following objectives:
(1) Formulated and implemented the "Outline for Poverty Alleviation and Development of China's Rural Areas (2001-2010)". At the end of 2000, more than 30 million poor rural residents in China had no adequate food and clothing, accounting for about 3% of the total rural population. There were a total of more than 60 million low-income people in the country at the time. The location of these poverty-stricken people showed features of "large dispersion, small concentration" which made it difficult to lift them out of poverty. To address this problem, the Chinese government promulgated the "Outline for Poverty Alleviation and Development of China's Rural Areas (2001-2010)" in 2001. It adjusted the rural poverty alleviation modes and strategies to pay equal attention to addressing food and clothing problem and consolidating the results, attach greater importance to the development of poverty-stricken people in poor areas while paying attention to the incomes of the poor. It emphasized the development of human resources, expanded the regional target range from poor counties to impoverished villages to make anti-poverty investment cover all poor villages and directly benefit the poorest. The Chinese government insisted on the combination of development-oriented poverty alleviation and the establishment of rural social security systems and continued to adhere to the principle of self-reliance and hard work. In addition, the government also paid attention to the active involvement of the poor in the decision-making, implementation, management and evaluation of poverty-relief projects.
In order to effectively address the hardships of the rural poor, achieve equal treatment of urban and rural poor people in subsistence, relief and gradually narrow the gap between urban and rural public services, the government set up the rural minimum living security system in 2007 to promote the establishment of a new pattern of two-wheel drive. It focused on paying equal attention to development-oriented poverty alleviation and life relief. In 2008, the "Decision" of the Third Plenary Session of the 17th Central Committee clearly proposed to "improve the national pro-poor strategy and policy system and adhere to development-oriented poverty alleviation in order to achieve the effective convergence of the rural minimum living security system and pro-poor policies". When the rural minimum living security system was implemented, various sectors and social organizations also increased efforts to support poverty alleviation. At the later stage of the implementation of the "Outline for Poverty Alleviation and Development of China's Rural Areas (2001-2010)", the pattern of large-scale poverty alleviation integrating special poverty reduction, industrial poverty relief and social poverty alleviation had been basically established.
On the basis of increasing annual special poverty-relief funds, the state strengthened the management of anti-poverty funds such that the pre-allocation of financial anti-poverty funds provide timely funding, implemented announcement system, reimbursement system, filing system and bidding system to make use of anti-poverty funds under the supervision of various sectors and the masses. It also established the performance appraisal system for financial anti-poverty funds to combine the distribution of poverty-relief funds with the poverty reduction effect of the funds; reformed the discount loan pattern for poor households; set up the "Award and Subsidy Funds" to promote the implementation of pilot projects of small loans for poor households; established the tracking and monitoring network for the management and use of poverty-relief funds, and the like. In this period, the government also actively explored new channels for anti-poverty funding, such as the use of mutual funds in poor villages and entire village advancement in old revolutionary base areas with the Lottery Fund.
(8) Further promoted fixed-point poverty alleviation and further expanded international exchanges and cooperation in the field of poverty reduction. Since 2002, a large number of central enterprises have joined the fixed-point poverty alleviation team and gradually become an important force for fixed-point poverty alleviation. The pattern of poverty alleviation for 272 central ministries and enterprises to help 481 key counties has been gradually established. During the same period, when some international organizations provided assistance to China, the Chinese government set up the International Poverty Reduction Center in China (IPRCC) in 2005, beginning to introduce China's successful experience in poverty alleviation to the international community.
(1) Poor rural population dropped significantly. The number of the rural poor was reduced from 90.3 million in 2001 to 26.88 million in 2010, the poverty incidence declined from 9.8% to 2.8%, and the number of the poor in 592 key counties for national poverty alleviation and development programs decreased from 56.77 million at the end of 2001 to 16.93 million in 2010 (note: the poor included people living in absolute poverty and the low-income poor).
Table 3 Incidence of Poverty in Rural China (2001-2010)
Year |
Absolute poverty |
Low-income poverty |
Poverty |
|||
Incidence |
Poor |
Incidence |
Poor |
Incidence |
Poor |
|
of poverty |
population |
of |
population |
of poverty |
population |
|
(%) |
(ten |
poverty |
(ten |
(%) |
(ten |
|
thousand) |
(%) |
thousand) |
thousand) |
|||
2001 |
3.2 |
2927 |
6.6 |
6103 |
9.8 |
9030 |
2002 |
3 |
2820 |
6.2 |
5825 |
9.2 |
8645 |
2003 |
3.1 |
2900 |
6 |
5617 |
9.1 |
8517 |
2004 |
2.8 |
2610 |
5.3 |
4977 |
8.1 |
7587 |
2005 |
2.5 |
2365 |
4.3 |
4067 |
7.8 |
6432 |
2006 |
2.3 |
2148 |
3.7 |
3550 |
6 |
5698 |
2007 |
1.6 |
1479 |
3 |
2841 |
4.6 |
4320 |
2008 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
4.2 |
4007 |
2009 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
3.8 |
3597 |
2010 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
2.8 |
2688 |
Source: Poverty Monitoring Report of the National Bureau of Statistics. |
9.4 Stage of “Outline for Poverty Alleviation and Development of China’s Rural Areas (2011-2020)” in the new era
After years of economic development, China has successfully entered the ranks of middle income countries. In 2010, calculated at comparable prices, China's gross domestic product (GDP) was higher than that of Japan and its economic aggregate ranked second in the world. Meanwhile, with the completion of the "Outline for Poverty Alleviation and Development of China's Rural Areas (2001-2010)" and the full implementation of the minimum living security system in rural areas, China had basically solved the absolute poverty problem in rural areas by the end of 2010. However since the global financial crisis of 2008, China's development model has been facing a series of tough challenges. At the same time, the problems of uneven development, the development gap and relative poverty become prominent. In order to further accelerate the development of poor areas and promote common prosperity so as to achieve the goal of building a well-off society in an all-round way by 2020, the central government held the anti-poverty meeting in 2011 and promulgated the Outline for Development-oriented Poverty Reduction Program for China's Rural Areas (2011-2020). This outline is another guiding document for the next ten year anti-poverty strategy which points out its objectives and missions, guiding principles, target scope and policy guarantees.
Poverty elimination and common prosperity are essential requirements of socialism. Since Reform and Opening-up, China’s development-oriented poverty reduction program has greatly progressed, poverty alleviation efforts have made great headway which has made great contributions to global efforts in poverty reduction. Now the primary task for the future ten years of poverty reduction has changed from ensuring peoples’ basic livelihoods to consolidating our accomplishments, helping people become well-off quicker, improve the ecological environment, enhance development capacity and narrow the development gap.
According to the national poverty line (set at 2300 Yuan per person per year) which was adjusted in 2011, there are still 122 million poor people in China, which means that development-oriented poverty reduction is a long-term mission. It shows that the country features a relatively low level of economic and social development, noticeable imbalances in regional development and deep-seated rural development bottlenecks. Rural China is plagued by the continued impoverishment of numerous residents, comparative deprivation, and frequent cases of falling back into poverty. The presence of underdeveloped areas that lie in contiguous poor areas with special difficulties renders the mission of reducing poverty particularly difficult.
For the above reasons, the central government put poverty reduction in a strategy perspective that points out the Development-oriented poverty reduction programming is critical to the consolidation of the basis for governance, the maintenance of political and social stability, and the advancement of the drive towards socialist modernization. Further facilitation of development-oriented poverty reduction is an important task for the building of socialism with Chinese characteristics, an inevitable requirement for implementation of Scientific Outlook on Development, and reflects an administrative mentality that puts people first. Such programming is also a key measure for achieving integrated urban and rural development, improving peoples’ livelihoods, bridging development gaps, and enabling all people to enjoy the fruits of Reform and Opening Up. It is urgently needed for the overall development of a well-off society and harmonious socialist society. We should therefore better position ourselves for a new round of strenuous effort with greater determination and enhanced effectiveness so as to ensure all-round prosperity for all Chinese people.
In the next ten years the guiding ideology of China’s development-oriented poverty reduction program is that operating under the guidance of socialism with Chinese characteristics, the Deng Xiaoping Theory, the important thought of “Three Represents” and the Scientific Outlook on Development. Under this ideology, the government’s priorities include raising the standard of poverty alleviation, making the contiguous poor areas with special difficulties the key target areas for its efforts, and improving access to food and clothing as well as helping people escape poverty more quickly. The government will continue to play a leading role in striving for balanced development, transforming patterns of economic development, improving comprehensive quality of people’s lives, achieving an equal distribution of basic public services, tackling acute problems that restrict development, and striving for better and faster development.
The Guiding principle is adhering to the policy of development-oriented poverty alleviation, which includes: Connecting the development-oriented approach with the subsistence allowance system; Making development-oriented poverty reduction program the main channel for shaking off poverty; Encouraging and supporting able-bodied poor people to escape poverty through their own efforts; Making the social security network the basic means to ensure subsistence and improving this network gradually.
The Outline (2011-2020) clearly points out the objectives for the new stage of poverty reduction that are to be attained by 2020, which are adequate food and clothing, compulsory education, basic medical care and housing being made available to the poor population; the per capita net income growth rate of poor peasants will be higher than the national average, leading indicators of basic public services to the national average, and the widening development gap bridged over time.
According to the above objectives, the missions can be summarized in the following four pillars and twelve tasks:
Pillar one: Economic Growth
Basic farmland, irrigation and water conservation: By 2015, basic farmland and water conservation facilities in poverty-stricken areas will be greatly improved to ensure per capita farmland for grain-growing. By 2020, quality of farmland infrastructure will be improved.
• Specialty and competitive industries: By 2015, the state will make every household benefit from at least one project designed to increase incomes. By 2020, a specialty and pillar industry system will be put in place.
Pillar two: Public Services
Pillar Three: Social Inclusion
Pillar Four: Sustainable Development
• Forestry and ecology: By 2015, forest acreage will be 1.5 percentage points more than that at the end of 2010. By 2020, forest acreage will be 3.5 percentage points more than that at the end of 2010.
The Outline (2011-2020) designates able-bodied rural residents whose incomes are below the poverty line as the targets for poverty reduction programming. The government will establish and improve identification mechanisms, build up archives and manage them dynamically so as to ensure effective support for the target populations.
As the poor population are gathering in the contiguous areas with special difficulties, key destitute areas that will be mainly supported by the government include contiguous poor areas like the Liupan Mountain area, the Qinba Mountain area, the Wulin Mountain area, the Wumeng Mountain area; rocky desertification areas in Yunnan, Guizhou and Guangxi provinces; mountainous border areas in Western Yunnan, the south of the Greater Khingan Mountains, the Yanshan Mountain-Taihang Mountain area, the Luliang Mountain area, the Dabie Mountain area, and the Luoxiao Mountain area; as well as Tibet, Tibetan ethnic areas in Sichuan, Yunnan, Gansu and Qinghai provinces and Kashgar, Hotan and Kezilesu Kirgiz Autonomous Prefecture of Xinjiang.
The government will channel more resources to those identified regions, step up trans-provincial guidance and coordination, pool the strengths of different parts of the government and launch appropriate projects sequentially.
The state will continue to give considerable support to key counties and poor villages that are outside the areas that lie in contiguous stretches. The support policy for originally-identified key counties remains unchanged. However, provinces (as well as autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the central government) should design and adopt various measures in line with their actual conditions to gradually reduce the number of key counties. The previous levels of government support will remain unchanged in cases in which counties develop from key counties into normal counties.
In order to further accelerate the development of poor areas and promote common prosperity in order to achieve the goal of building a well-off society in an all-round way by 2020, the new outline designates the following policies:
Improve anti-poverty strategy and policy system
The policy system will give play to the comprehensive benefits of special, industrial and social poverty alleviation efforts; integrate development-oriented poverty reduction projects with the social security system, and carry out impact assessments before initiating important policies and projects that might affect poverty reduction work.
Increase the central and local governments’ financial inputs
The additional poverty reduction funding from the central budget will be used in contiguous areas with special difficulties. General transfer payments from central and provincial budgets toward the poverty-stricken areas will be increased, as will the use of lottery proceeds for the purpose of poverty reduction. No tariff will be levied for state-approved domestic and foreign investment projects; foreign-funded competitive industry projects in Eastern and Central China; self-use equipment unable to be produced domestically; or technologies, accessories and spare parts imported alongside such equipment. If eligible, corporate donations to poor people can be deducted according to relevant tax regulations.
Intensify investment in infrastructure, ecological environment and welfare projects
The policy will promote more village-level roads and develop agriculture comprehensively. It will also protect land resources and small river basins, control water and soil erosion, and develop hydropower in rural areas. The state-arranged projects for the consolidation of dangerous reservoirs, ecological construction, drinking water safety, supporting transformation in large irrigated areas and other public benefits projects will not receive supporting funds from government agencies at or below county level nor government agencies of contiguous areas with special difficulties in Western China. Governments at all levels should intensify investment support for contiguous areas with special difficulties.
Improve national anti-poverty discounted-interest loan policies
Actively promoting innovation of financial products and service modes in poverty-stricken areas, encouraging development of small-sum credit loans, and satisfying poor peoples’ need for funds to develop production is another important dimension of the new policy system. It will carry out anti-poverty loan projects for rehabilitation of the handicapped, enable coverage of poor areas by financial institutions and financial services, and guide civil loans to develop normally. It will also widen financing channels of poor areas and encourage financial institutions incorporated at county level in poor areas to make over 70% of their additional loans locally. The state will energetically develop insurance services in rural areas by urging insurance institutions to establish grassroots service networks in poverty-stricken areas. It will also improve existing agriculture premium subsidy policies, inspire local communities to develop specialty agriculture insurance targeting specialty and leading industries of poor areas and strengthen the rural credit system.
Implement various industrial policies under the Western Development Project
Large-scale national projects, key projects and emerging industries should be arranged in favor of qualified poverty-stricken areas. Labor-intensive industries should be guided toward poor areas as well. Market development in poor areas should be reinforced. The state supports reasonable development and utilization of resources in poverty-stricken areas and will improve policies to support the development of specialty and competitive industries.
Improve land utilization
New land for construction should first be used to satisfy house-building requirements for those who are relocated from poor areas. The state will reasonably arrange land for construction in small towns and concentrated industrial parks, reclaim more land, favor eligible key counties in terms of project arrangement, and support poverty-stricken areas to utilize mineral resources in an eco-friendly and orderly way.
Protect ecological environment
The state will continue to launch grain-to-green, pastureland-to-grassland, water and soil conservation, natural forest protection, and shelter forest construction projects as well as controlling desertification in Karst areas and other regions. An ecological compensation mechanism favoring poverty-stricken areas will be created and ecological compensation for key ecological function areas will be intensified. Protection of biodiversity in poor areas will be prioritized on the agenda.
Guarantee of talents
The government will organize personnel from the education, science, culture and health sectors as well as volunteers to work in poverty-stricken areas. It will also formulate policy encouraging institutions of higher learning, research institutions and medical institutions to nurture talented individuals for poor areas. The government will guide college students to work or start businesses in poor areas, design incentive policies for officials who hold long-term posts in poor areas, and favor technicians of all sectors in terms of posts and job titles. It will show more care to officials who hold temporary posts in poor areas under targeted poverty reduction programs or the East-Help-West Program, making proper arrangements for their work and life so as to give full play to their advantages, engage with talents who start their own business in poverty reduction efforts and give more training to officials in poor areas.
Focus on key groups
Having incorporated development-oriented poverty reduction program schemes for ethnic minorities, women, children and the handicapped into its planning, the state will make unified arrangements for their implementation, give priority to their implementation when all conditions are equal, and strengthen support for these groups. It will organize the implementation of a special program to revitalize border areas, enrich the local people and help smaller ethnic groups shake off poverty. It will promote women of poor households to participate in the activity of learning culture and technology, comparing performance and contribution, and will pay attention to those women and children who are left in the countryside. The state will formulate and implement the Development-oriented Poverty Reduction Program for Disabled People in Rural Areas (2011-2020) to enhance their subsistence and development abilities.
扫描下载手机客户端
地址:北京朝阳区太阳宫北街1号 邮编100028 电话:+86-10-84419655 传真:+86-10-84419658(电子地图)
版权所有©中国国际扶贫中心 未经许可不得复制 京ICP备2020039194号-2